Tuesday, January 13, 2015

A reflection on WHIPLASH...

Firstly, I thank my friend who asked me to see this masterpiece of a film and critique it. Without her, I would have taken a little while longer to discover this jewel.

The movie follows the story of a 19 year old college kid, Andrew Neimer. Seeing that he is a bit of a prodigy with the drum sticks, he is taken under the wings of Terence Fletcher, a conductor of a major Jazz band. And Terence Fletcher plays the perfect hard ass taskmaster. Probably the kind that makes Coach Carter look like a kindergarten student. He has only one mission to his life, that is, to do whatever it takes to excel at music. And the members of his band, are always at the receiving end of this ruthlessness.

J.K. Simmons, in black, and totally bald, and totally buff, plays the quintessential devil conductor, with the ear for detail that would put an owl to shame.


He almost single handedly conducts the film with his performance as a musical conductor who leads a Jazz band.

For a movie that is completely immersed in the beats and the bars of music, it’s the silence that overtakes; it’s the silence that shines through. Silence, when Simmons lashes out, silence, when the naive Neimann Teller, looks dazed, it’s the silence, that draws you in, wants you to be there, to witness, as you breathe, and not a whisper shall exit, as you watch.

And somehow, through some wizardry, the camera just manages to be at the right place at the right time without ever RUSHING or DRAGGING. From a vibrating drum stick to the sheet music and out from the cymbal and on to the streets. All in perfect symphony. All on the mark! Perhaps a major front runner for the best editing oscar.

And the conversations, nothing is random. But disguised to feel so. Every statement, leading to some sort of a crescendo, a realization, that we as an audience, will be allowed to share, and them as the characters, will only just brush unwillingly against.

To be so subtle and so strong, both at the same time, is a feat so rare, I feel delighted to have witnessed this film.

And yet, in the most surprising of ways, every now and then, the film manages to be just funny enough for us to slip back into the chair. And that’s only because we are required to. We are required to settle down, before another symphony strikes hard at us. And its only a matter of time, before we are drawn right back in, to the edge of the seats, not in anticipation, but in awe perhaps.

Just when I think, that the film is beginning to fall back into a place so familiar, like  a run of the mill scene, it rises up.

For instance in the dinner table family conversation scene, the scene starts slow, and builds up to a crescendo, to finally reveal a stark contrast of the human beings who often settle for a comfortable mediocrity, against the young Neimann, who shall accept nothing but the absolute best for himself and his dreams. Inspiring!

The force of young unadulterated dreams. The unyielding optimism of the kid within us, that spoke up at family dinners, unafraid of looking ridiculous. Captured beautifully in the innocent, and yet fierce face of Neimann.

As I was watching it, I was scared, that the filmmaker would reduce this “masterpiece” in the making, to something simpler like “a story, well told”. But no, it stays above. It just gets more intense, and just bloody stays above the pitfalls of plot. And there’s plenty of plot, for the average moviegoer to jerk off to. But it stays above that, it stays afloat.

It challenges the audience to reach it. To have a heart and a spirit, big enough to understand the characters. Unlike Christopher Nolan, who only challenges the audience intellectually, this movie challenges the audience’s desire to excel or dream or plain just feel. To feel for things, beyond the mundane, beyond the mediocre.

There is no respite for Neimann on his journey. His master, Fletcher, flogs his spirit time and again, to see if he comes out stronger. And Neimann is no easier on himself mind you. Ruthless, is the only word that creeps up to describe his attitude towards himself.

And as I watched it all I could do was secretly hope, that at no point, will he be destroyed by it. His ruthlessness. Though all of history has something else to suggest, I found myself praying, that he survives.

The magic of this story, much like “Night crawler”, is that the chief characters are beyond the realm of the regular human. And yet, we connect, and we cheer for them. Even if they are going to drive themselves into a truck or off a cliff in trying to get to the place called greatness, we still cheer them. We cheer them till they crash, perish and get destroyed. Maybe because we feel safe in the comfort of our seats, watching a couple of characters do something we always aspire, but never truly dare to do. To pursue a dream as if our life depends on it!

The blood Neimann leaves behind on drums and the cymbals is almost the price he is paying for a shot at greatness. And he leaves behind plenty of blood.

Fletcher and Neimann are the same guys. Almost like a mirror placed in front of either of them. It was established in the first shot, when the kid is practicing his notes on a drum and Fletcher zeroes in onto him. Kind of like the meeting of the past and the future. A beautiful way to begin a movie.

Whenever Fletcher falls, so does Neimann. They both rise and fall together.

And the way the movie ends was amazing…

When the little blood and sweat that was due, when it is shed, greatness shall fall down at your feet, and the credits shall roll. Greatness for both the master and his follower.

And I have a feeling it’s the director Damien Chazelle, who has begun his journey towards greatness.


Friday, January 9, 2015

JJ Abrams vs Micheal Bay

I just saw a question posted on Yahoo, asking who is better, JJ Abrams or Micheal Bay.

A pointless question, it would have been a few years ago, for JJ Abrams is the superior action director by light years.

But then, the legacy of billions of dollars of Box office returns over the ACTION PORN franchise called Transformers, has Transformed JJ Abrams, into a reasonably predictable action sequence guy.

But yet, it still is a pointless question, because, despite all the selling out to studio shit, JJ Abrams is still perhaphs the best Action director active today. (Atleast until Tarantino chooses to attack the action thriller genre)...

He can build any action sequence into a crescendo, moving the audience into a climax they almost crave for by the end. He does so, by adding, not complexity of action, but emotions.

For instance check this sequence below from Star Trek... Into Darkness



Before this chase begins, we see Kirk die. And this does something, that we never saw almost ever in the STAR TREK UNIVERSE. Spock breaks into an emotional tear.

Then the chase ensues, and by now, the audience is emotionally invested in the chase. And they bloody want Spock, to kick Khan's ass.

But before the chase becomes a piece of mundane shit, emotional investment is increased midway by the information that Khan's blood can save Kirk.

And then, now, we dont want Spock to Kick Khan's ass anymore! Wonderful scripting, and wonderful direction....

As far as Micheal Bay is concerned.... Well, He can keep jerking off till kingdom come to his mindless TRANFORMERS fare. 

But when Kingdom does come for him, he, along with his films, will be buried way deep down underneath the billions of dollars he has made for the studios from his ACTION PORN.

And JJ Abrams, he would probably leave behind a body of work that shall be studied over and over again. He is bound to be remembered as the Director who infused wonderful new life into STAR TREK and STAR WARS(When it will be out)

Fans might disagree, But I am open to an argument. Bring it on!